For several weeks, people had been stepping around the same place.
It began after the rains.
Water had cut a small channel across a path used by families living nearby.
At first, it was hardly an inconvenience.
People simply stepped over it.
Children knew where to jump.
Those carrying heavier loads learned to walk around the edge.
Then it rained again.
The channel became wider.
Someone placed a few stones across it.
For a while, that helped.
But more rain came.
The stones disappeared beneath the water, and the soil continued washing away.
People talked about it.
One person wondered why the local authorities had not repaired it.
Another thought those living closest to the damaged section should do something.
Someone else said the problem had become too large for ordinary people to handle.
They were not wrong to ask these questions.
But every morning, people continued approaching the same damaged path.
They stopped.
They carefully found their way around it.
And then they continued with their day.
Months passed.
One morning, an older man stood beside the damaged section longer than usual.
He watched several people navigate their way around it.
Then he asked a simple question:
“How many of us have walked around this place?”
Nobody answered.
Perhaps because everyone already knew.
Then came another question:
“What would have happened if, the first time we noticed it, we had stopped together?”
The question was no longer only about the path.
How Does Something Everyone Sees Become Nobody’s Responsibility?
Perhaps we recognise this story because the path could be many things.
A shared water point slowly deteriorating.
A young person beginning to lose direction.
An elderly neighbour increasingly struggling alone.
A disagreement between two families becoming deeper.
A public space becoming neglected.
A problem affecting farmers, traders or livestock keepers that everyone discusses but nobody gathers people around.
Often, nobody is completely unaware.
People see.
People talk.
People may even care deeply.
Yet somehow the problem remains.
Perhaps this happens because seeing something and feeling responsible for it are not the same thing.
We may ask:
Who is supposed to deal with this?
Sometimes that is exactly the right question.
Governments have responsibilities.
Institutions have responsibilities.
Families have responsibilities.
Leaders have responsibilities.
Individuals have responsibilities.
But perhaps there is another question that deserves to sit beside it:
Is there something here that belongs to all of us?
What Changes When We Say “Ours”?
There is a significant difference between saying:
“There is a problem.”
and saying:
“We have a problem.”
The problem itself may not have changed.
But the relationship between the people and the problem has.
The word “ours” introduces responsibility.
And responsibility does not necessarily mean that everybody must contribute the same thing.
One person may have knowledge.
Another may have time.
Another may know whom to contact.
Someone may have tools.
Someone may have influence.
Someone may understand the history of the problem.
Another may simply be able to gather people around the same table.
Perhaps communities become stronger not when everybody possesses the same capacity, but when different capacities can be brought toward a shared concern.
But Why Do We Sometimes Hesitate?
Working together sounds simple until people actually have to do it.
Someone may remember the last time they contributed while others did nothing.
Another may fear that a few people will carry most of the burden.
Someone may distrust the people leading the effort.
Others may wonder whether their contribution will make any difference.
And some problems genuinely require resources or authority beyond what a community possesses.
These concerns matter.
Shared responsibility should never mean that governments or institutions transfer their obligations to communities.
Nor should community mean that responsible people continually carry those who refuse to contribute.
Working together requires trust.
Fairness.
Accountability.
And clarity about who should carry what.
Perhaps the challenge is therefore not simply convincing people to help.
It is learning how to carry responsibility together without allowing responsibility to disappear.
We Have Known Something About This for a Long Time
Long before today’s institutions and development programmes, communities faced problems that exceeded the capacity of individual households.
Building.
Harvesting.
Responding to hardship.
Protecting shared resources.
Supporting families through difficult seasons.
People discovered something very practical:
There are burdens that become different when more than one pair of hands carries them.
In Kenya, one word has come to represent something of this understanding:
Harambee.
To many people today, Harambee may immediately suggest fundraising.
But beneath that familiar use is a deeper human principle:
pulling together.
Not because everyone has the same resources.
Not because everybody agrees about everything.
And not because institutions no longer matter.
But because there are moments when waiting for someone else can become part of the problem.
Perhaps the First Resource Is Already Present
Communities often think about what they lack.
Money.
Infrastructure.
Expertise.
Technology.
Government support.
Investment.
And these things can genuinely matter.
But what if the first question were different?
What is already here?
Who understands this problem?
Who has lived with it longest?
Who has a useful skill?
Who knows someone who could help?
Who can bring people together?
Who has tried something before?
Who can listen?
Who can contribute time?
Who can begin?
Perhaps development does not always begin when resources arrive.
Sometimes it begins when people recognise resources that were already present in one another.
Returning to the Path
Imagine returning to that damaged path.
The channel is still there.
People are still walking around it.
But this time someone stops.
Then another person stops.
And instead of asking only,
“Who should fix this?”
someone asks:
“What part of this can we carry ourselves, and where do we need others to carry their part?”
That question does not guarantee success.
But something important has already changed.
People who were previously navigating the problem individually have begun facing it together.
Perhaps that is where Harambee truly begins.
Not with money.
Not with a slogan.
Not even with a project.
But with a moment when people look at something affecting them all and decide:
We should not keep walking around this separately.
And perhaps there is something in our own families, organisations, neighbourhoods or communities that deserves the same question:
What have we become so accustomed to walking around that we have forgotten we could stop and face it together?
And if something comes to mind:
Who might we need to stop with?
Leave a Reply